It was a beautiful summer morning, and I was enjoying yoga on the dock in my peaceful Port Byron community, located along the banks of the great Mississippi River.  Just as I was gazing up to the tranquil sky, a majestic bald eagle soared by. I thought to myself what a wonderful place to live. My peace and the safety of this gorgeous land would, unbeknownst to me, soon be in for an epic battle.

Later that morning after arriving home, I was presented with a certified letter from the local post office, from a company out of Denver, Colorado, named Wolf Carbon Solutions. I was not expecting this letter, but I soon found out that on Friday June 16^th  the Wolf company had filed an application with the Illinois Commerce Commission for a certificate of authority that would allow them to build a 260-mile pipeline transporting liquid carbon dioxide from ethanol plants in Cedar Rapids and Clinton, to Decatur Illinois. There they would take the carbon dioxide gas from large ethanol facilities, pressurize it, and then transport it through my neighborhood and several other counties in Illinois. In addition to the pipeline, approximately 33 facilities will need to be built across our land and private property.

Intervention

Intervening in the Illinois Commerce Commission's protocol, which is trial by jury, is the best way to stop the carbon dioxide pipeline project. Last summer the Coalition to Stop CO2 Pipelines formed a nonprofit organization that allowed landowners to actively oppose another company named Navigators, preventing them from installing a pipeline by forcing them to withdraw their application. The Coalition is represented by attorneys from the surrounding areas who will oppose Wolf, now that they have filed to place their pipeline near rural residents and businesses and either through or near communities that include Port Byron, Hillsdale, Geneseo, Lafayette, Brimfield, and many others. Welcome - Coalition to Stop CO2 Pipelines (noillinoisco2pipelines.org)

This CO2 pipeline is not like other pipelines. CO2 must be pressurized by putting the gas under extreme pressure. One minor leak or rupture could be catastrophic. Under pressure CO2 can explode from a pipeline and within minutes can asphyxiate people and animals, all living creatures in the area would be suffocated. In fact, in 2020, a leak in a 24-inch pipe near Satartia, Mississippi required more than 200 people to be evacuated and sent 46 to the hospital including first responders. There are also undocumented reports of people that died.

Coming Soon to Your Neighborhood

Wolf and other companies of the same, will be pursuing their predatorial tactics across the nation as the Biden administration has funded these private organizations to capture gaseous carbon dioxide waste transfer it miles from the source and run it through our private neighborhoods, school districts, farms, churches, and businesses. Pipelines don't belong in neighborhoods! Especially those that are underregulated and pose a real threat to our crops, our natural wooded lands, and our waterways.  This pipeline could go directly through my neighborhood of Byron Woods and affect more than 40 homeowners, rural properties, school district, churches, and farms. The current law allows private property to be taken under the law of eminent domain. It's a scary thought to know that if this Wolf succeeds in its effort to secure a certificate through the Illinois Commerce Commission, it will be a runaway train that will be hard to stop. And it’s coming soon to your neighborhood.

Eight Reasons to Oppose CO2 Pipelines

According to Coalition to Stop CO2 Pipelines, the following are the top eight reasons to stop the construction of CO2 pipelines:

1. CO₂Pipelines Aren't Safe
   In order to transport the carbon dioxide via pipeline, it must be liquified under pressure three times the rate of natural gas. CO₂ pipelines can, and do, rupture or leak. When this occurs, an explosive plume of CO₂ gas can emerge that can travel a mile or more.  Because it is an asphyxiant, and heavier than air and accumulates in low-lying areas, the CO₂ plume can suffocate all living beings, and prevent internal combustion engines in gas-powered vehicles from starting, making escape and rescue difficult or impossible. 

1. Eminent Domain 
   The Illinois Commerce Commission (ICC) will grant eminent domain if they approve a CO2 pipeline, and landowners will have no say over whether a carbon pipeline company can build through their property. This is particularly true in Illinois, because the state has adopted the Carbon Dioxide Transportation and Sequestration Act. As currently written, the Act establishes carbon capture as a public good, a key criterion for enabling eminent domain. The Illinois Commerce Commission may consider landowner objections to the pipeline based on safety, if many intervene in the ICC proceedings. For that reason, landowners should NOT SIGN A VOLUNTARY EASEMENT at this time. Doing so will waive future rights. (Also do not allow the company’s surveyors on your private property and put up NO TRESPASSING signs.) 

1. Few Regulations Exist for CO₂Pipelines
   Carbon pipelines are dangerous and underregulated. CO2 is an asphyxiant that can travel large distances at lethal concentrations from the pipeline after a rupture. CO2 pipelines are prone to ductile fractures which, like a zipper, open up and run down a significant length of the pipe, while releasing immense amounts of CO2, hurling large sections of pipe, and generating enormous craters. A small amount of water in a CO2 pipeline allows the formation of carbonic acid which can corrode the pipeline, causing a leak or rupture. 

After investigating the CO2 pipeline rupture near Satartia, Mississippi, the Pipeline Hazardous Materials and Safety Administration (PHMSA) announced a rule-making process to improve safety and oversight of CO2 pipelines. But Navigator and ADM/Wolf are moving forward with their projects before the rulemaking is complete. 

1. Damages to Topsoil and Reduced Crop Yield.Productivity of cropland can be negatively affected by construction. A 2021 Iowa State Universitystudy of pipeline construction impacts associated with the Dakota Access Pipeline found “extensive soil disturbance from construction activities had adverse effects on soil physical properties, resulting from the mixing of topsoil with backfill brought in for filling pipeline trenches; and soil compaction from heavy machinery. ”  These impacts can discourage root growth and reduce water infiltration. The research team found:

"Crop yields in the right-of-way were reduced by an average of 25% for soybeans and 15% for corn during the first and second crop seasons, compared to undisturbed fields.” 

1. Construction of CO₂Pipelines On the Rise
   Section 45Q of the Internal Revenue Code provides tax credits on a per-ton basis to companies that successfully trap, sequester and store carbon emissions, preventing them from entering the atmosphere. In August of 2022, the Biden Administration’s Inflation Reduction Act increased these credits from $60 to $85 a ton for carbon stored underground, further accelerating the “mad dash” to build pipelines for corporate profit. 

There are currently 5,100 miles of CO₂ pipelines in this country. But projections from Princeton University indicate there could be as many as 66,000 miles of CO₂ pipelines built across the country to meet the demand for carbon capture and sequestration, accelerating impacts and risk.   

1. For Landowners, It's All Risk and No Reward
   Private corporations’ profit from carbon capture and sequestration via federal tax credits and low-interest loans. Landowners take all the risk, with little to no reward. While they are compensated initially for the use of their land, payments from pipeline companies do not begin to approach those that are received from wind or solar located on their farmland. Such renewable energy technologies either power a farm, residence, commercial / industrial property or feed into the grid. Or, if the land is leased by a solar or wind developer, landowners are paid annually in long-term, revenue-sharing agreements. 
   
   
2. Pipelines Extend the Life of Fossil Fuels

Instead of spending money to more rapidly deploy renewable energy technologies, billions of federal dollars are being spent to keep the fossil fuel industry in business.

This is particularly true for projects that involve enhanced oil recovery (EOR) which puts more carbon into the atmosphere when it is burned. We need to keep fossil fuels in the ground in order to meet critical climate targets. 

1. Carbon Capture and Storage Hasn't Worked

Despite extensive public subsidies, 80% of the projects that have attempted to commercialize carbon capture and sequestration technology, have ended in failure. Between 2005 and 2012, the Department of Energy spent $6.9 billion attempting to demonstrate the feasibility of CCS for coal, but less than 4% of the planned CCS capacity was ever deployed. Why use taxpayer dollars to fund a CO2 pipeline system for a technology that has such a poor track record? Plus, there is no proof that the carbon sequestered will remain permanently stored. The greenwashing that calls out CCS as a viable climate solution is setting dangerous policy by diverting funds from technologies we know work.

Moratoriums

A building moratorium is an action that halts the construction of a project or projects. Moratoriums are commonly imposed by cities, towns or the courts, for a variety of reasons. They can be short-term or indefinite, depending on the project and the reason the moratorium was issued. Moratoriums may be issued for a specific period of time — such as six months to one year — in order to allow issues of concern to be resolved or may also be imposed for an indefinite period. In some cases, moratoriums may even be renewed and extended over a long period of time. Often, environmental and safety concerns are cited when a moratorium is put into place. In certain situations, concerned citizens may even approach a judge to ask for an injunction or an immediate halt to construction.

I think all cities and counties in the path of this destructive and unsafe venture by these wolves, should pass a moratorium as soon as possible. I know there are many alliances and coalitions out there right now working hard on our behalf. You can find more information at Welcome - Coalition to Stop CO2 Pipelines (noillinoisco2pipelines.org) or contact Central Illinois Healthy Community Alliance at [email protected] or call 309-369-5331. Time is of the essence, and we need to fund the attorneys who are fighting for us and representing us in the court proceedings with the Illinois Commerce Commission.

“By using moratoria, municipalities are able to prevent the surge of development likely to occur when a municipality announces its intent to rezone, enact a new comprehensive land use plan, or adopt a growth management program.

Authority for enacting moratoria is often found as an implied power in a state’s zoning enabling act to exercise the police power to in the context of a municipality’s zoning and planning authority. For example, most Illinois land use moratoriums cite 65 ILCS 5/11-13-1, et seq., as its authority to enact the land use moratorium for, among other things, the protection of public health, safety, comfort, morals, and welfare.” (Shapiro & Associates Law) LAND USE MORATORIUMS (shapiroassociateslaw.com) 

Statutory Authority

“The state has the authority to exercise its police powers to protect the public health, safety, and welfare. In addition to specific authority for land-use regulation and the provision of public services, general police powers have been delegated by the state to cities and counties:

A city may by ordinance define, prohibit, regulate, or abate acts, omissions, or conditions, detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of its citizens and the peace and dignity of the city, and may define and abate nuisances.

Local governments also have been delegated the authority to regulate businesses and prohibit those that are nuisances or that may be inimical to the public health, welfare, safety, order, or convenience.

In addition to this general police power, several statutes give local governments specific land-use and development regulatory authority. The zoning enabling acts grant cities and counties authority to regulate and restrict density of population and the location and use of land and buildings. Within zoning districts, they may regulate and restrict the erection, construction, reconstruction, alteration, repair, and use of buildings and land for a variety of purposes, including preventing overcrowding, facilitating the adequate provision of public services, and promoting health, safety, and welfare. The subdivision statutes authorize regulations to provide for the orderly growth and development of cities and counties. Other more specific statutes authorize regulation of floodways, water supply watersheds, airport areas, places of amusement, and public health nuisances. The statutes are silent, however, as to local governments' specific authority to adopt development moratoria.

The question then is whether these grants of authority to regulate and prohibit certain activities to protect the public health, safety, and welfare include the authority to adopt moratoria. For discretionary acts of the governing board, such as rezonings, they clearly do. A governing board is under no obligation to change its zoning, and it can withhold that approval as its sound judgment dictates. A moratorium on rezonings can be established by the governing board's refusal to adopt amendments to an existing, valid zoning ordinance. For nonregulatory matters, such as decisions on the extension of utility services or hookups to water and sewer systems, local governments can impose reasonable restrictions when necessary to respond to problems such as a lack of treatment capacity. For example, recently the city of Jacksonville successfully defended in the federal courts a moratorium on multi-family sewer hookups imposed due to a lack of wastewater treatment capacity.” (UNC School of Government)  Land-Use and Development Moratoria | UNC School of Government

Fight the Good Fight of Faith

The Bible tells us in 1 Timothy 6:12 to fight the good fight of faith and we are reminded in 2 Corinthians 5:7 to walk by faith and not by sight. I believe in these principles and now more than ever we need to put them into practice. We are also like the Scripture says, sheep being sent out amongst wolves:

Matthew 10:16-20 “I am sending you out like sheep among wolves. Therefore, be as shrewd as snakes and as innocent as doves. Be on your guard; you will be handed over to the local councils and be flogged in the synagogues. On my account you will be brought before governors and kings as witnesses to them and to the Gentiles. But when they arrest you, do not worry about what to say or how to say it. At that time you will be given what to say, for it will not be you speaking, but the Spirit of your Father speaking through you.”

Rochelle Arnold graduated from RHEMA Bible School and is the Founder of Change the World Ministries. Her desire is to impact the culture for Christ through sound teaching and the fine arts. Author of Rags or Robes: Finding Your Identity in Christ & SOJOURNERS: In a Strange Land available on Amazon