The Rapture and the Church in the Book of Revelation, Part Three: Who are the 24 Elders?
by Robert Hawes This is part three in a series of articles examining pretribulationist arguments concerning the church in the book of Revelation as put forth by Dr. Robert Gromacki. Click here for part one and here for part two. In describing his vision of the throne room of God, the apostle John tells us that he saw a group of individuals he refers to as “elders”:
The identities of these twenty-four elders have long been a mystery. They are mentioned a number of times in the book of Revelation, are depicted as singing and worshipping God, and at least one of them interacts with John, but they are not described in any detail beyond the passage I cited above. John does not tell us who they are. Posttribulationists such as myself believe that the twenty-four elders are high-ranking angelic beings. On the other hand, dispensational pretribulationists like Dr. Gromacki believe that they are redeemed humans who represent the raptured church at large. Gromacki comments on this as follows:
Gromacki offers what he believes are a number of evidences in favor of this interpretation. I will examine these evidences in turn; however, the first point I would offer in favor of the posttribulation position that the elders are angelic beings has to do with the chronology issue I covered in part two of this series. If, indeed, the future or “revelation” portion of the book begins in chapter 6 (and not in chapter 4, as Gromacki believes), then the entire issue of the elders is moot with regard to the rapture debate: the elders were present in heaven two thousand years ago and cannot be raptured saints. I believe that the text establishes this conclusion firmly and that pretribulationists will find this an insurmountable problem in their theology, but let’s look at Gromacki’s evidences and see what he has to offer.
In reply, I have to say that I’m a bit surprised that Gromacki would make this comparison to David’s division of the Levitical priesthood. Ordinarily, dispensationalists strongly resist applying Old Covenant, Israel-specific terminology to the church, especially where prophecy is concerned. Later in his article Gromacki goes on to point out items that he believes are prominent symbols that distinguish Israel from the church in Revelation, allegedly showing that God’s emphasis is on Israel rather than the church during the Great Tribulation. I can hardly think of anything more symbolic of Israel than the Old Covenant priesthood, so it seems odd to me that Gromacki would liken the division of the priesthood to the elders if the elders represent the church. Indeed, outside of the book of Revelation, the number twenty-four is used only in the Old Testament; it appears nowhere else in the New, and in Revelation it is used only in reference to the elders. In regard to the number twenty-four being a ‘number of representation’ based on David’s division of the Levitical priesthood, several observations can be made: A “representative” Group versus a great Multitude First, why would it be necessary for John to be shown a representation of the church in the form of twenty-four persons if the entire church is in heaven during the events of Revelation 4? Why was John not instead shown masses of redeemed saints surrounding the throne of God, just as he saw masses of angels around the throne in chapter 5?
In fact, we see just such a depiction in Revelation 7, after the sixth seal is opened:
In this passage, John sees a multitude of people so vast in scope that he could not count them, gathered around the throne of God along with all of the angels. This is exactly what we would expect to see (and when we would expect to see it if the posttribulation view is correct. In chapter 6, when Christ opens the sixth seal, John sees the following:
The opening of the sixth seal brings with it the Old Testament signs of the Day of the Lord:
These are the same signs that Jesus said will follow the Great Tribulation, before he returns to gather his elect:
Immediately after the opening of the sixth seal and the cosmic signs of the Day of the Lord, we see 144,000 Jews sealed before any harm is done to the earth (Revelation 7:1-8). This would make perfect sense if, as the Old Testament says, they will be delivered from the wrath of God and will believe on Christ when they see him coming:
The Jews that are sealed are God-fearing but have not yet believed on Christ. For this reason, they require a special seal of protection so that they will be delivered when the wrath of God is poured out. Believers, on the other hand, are already sealed by the Spirit of God (II Corinthians 1:22, Ephesians 1:13 and 4:30). They are caught up to meet Christ after the Great Tribulation, before the Day of the Lord. Indeed, one of the elders tells John that they have “come out of the great tribulation.” Now think back on the letters that Christ dictated to the seven churches (and consider also the book’s concluding remarks where the churches are mentioned once again) and compare them to what John saw and was told about the great multitude.
The close similarities between the admonitions to the churches in the opening and closing of Revelation, and the description of the great multitude of chapter 7, are not coincidental. As I demonstrated in part one of this study, the emphasis between Revelation chapters 3 and 19 is on the saints rather than the churches because it is the saints—the holy ones, the consecrated ones, the sacred ones—irrespective of their churches, who will overcome the Beast and emerge victorious from the Great Tribulation. The great multitude is just such a group, appearing in John’s account after the opening of the sixth seal and the cosmic signs of the Day of the Lord, which Jesus said would follow the Great Tribulation and precede his own coming, at which point he will gather his elect. Note also that John tells us that the members of this group had “palm branches…in their hands” and were crying out, “Salvation to our God who sits on the throne and to the Lamb.” This imagery harkens back to the Old Testament description of the Feast of Booths, which Leviticus 23 tells us was to be held for a period of seven days following the harvest:
The prophet Zechariah tells us that this feast will be celebrated during the Millennial age:
The description of the Feast of Booths in Leviticus 23 shows us that it was meant to be a celebration of Israel’s deliverance from bondage to the bounty of the Promised Land, which is why it was held after the harvest: as the people prospered, they were to remember the great deliverance that had made their prosperity possible. Likewise, in Revelation 7, we see those of the great multitude, having “come out of the great tribulation,” where they were heavily oppressed by the Beast and his False Prophet, waving palms before the Lord and praising him for his salvation. John is told that they “will hunger no longer, nor thirst anymore; nor will the sun beat down on them, nor any heat; for the Lamb in the center of the throne will be their shepherd, and will guide them to springs of the water of life; and God will wipe away every tear from their eyes.” The parallels in the imagery of the great multitude and ancient Israel’s celebration of the Feast of Booths seem clear. It was not only a celebration of deliverance from bondage but also one of entering into blessing. For ancient Israel, that blessing was entrance into the Promised Land; for the saints, it will be entrance into the Kingdom of God. This is underscored for us in the book of Daniel, from which the book of Revelation draws heavily in terms of its style and symbolism.[1] Consider the following from Daniel chapter 7, in which Daniel recounts a vision he was given of the end of days, one in which he saw four “beasts,” representing four gentile kingdoms, rise up with great power:
Daniel goes on to inquire about the fourth beast, the most fearsome one he had seen, which gave rise to “a little horn” that waged war against the saints:
Daniel is then given the interpretation of this vision. The fourth beast is a powerful empire that will give rise to ten kings, after which another king will arise (the “little horn”) and make war on the saints of God until he is finally overthrown by divine decree:
The one who spoke with Daniel in these passages emphasized that the saints would be oppressed by “the little horn” until such time as God intervenes, delivers them from their oppression, and they inherit the kingdom. All of this is pictured for us in John’s description of the great multitude and in the explanation provided to him by the elder with whom he spoke. Moreover, I believe Daniel 7 also provides a bit more insight into the elders themselves. When John first sees the elders, they’re seated on thrones around the throne of God (Revelation 4:4). For his part, Daniel tells us that “thrones were set up” in the presence of God (Daniel 7:9) and that a divine court passed judgment in favor of the saints (Daniel 7:22 and 26). Given the close parallels between Daniel and Revelation, the thrones Daniel described seeing around the throne of God almost certainly belong to the elders. Daniel does not mention the elders directly, but he references the heavenly “court,” and John tells us in Revelation 11 that the elders proclaim their agreement with God’s judgment of the earth and his rewarding of the saints:
Notice that the elders are seated on their thrones when the seventh trumpet sounds and the proclamation of the kingdom goes forth. Judgment has been passed in favor of the saints. The parallels to Daniel 7 are unmistakable; they reveal that the elders are not saints and thus cannot represent the church. They comprise the heavenly court that sits along with God the Father in judgment of various matters, or at least in the capacity of witnesses. Nearly every time they are seen in the book of Revelation, they are quoted as affirming the “worthiness” of the Father and the Lamb or the righteousness of some aspect of divine justice. Similarities to the Levitical Priesthood Dr. Gromacki makes the argument that we should consider the number of the elders as representing a larger group because of the division of the Levitical priesthood, but I think he may have the order of things backward here. I do not believe that the elders are based on David’s division of the Levites; rather, I suspect that David was led to divide the Levites based on the pattern of the elders (and possibly other members of the heavenly host as well). The Levites became the priestly class by divine decree during Israel’s time in the wilderness. In Numbers 3, God tells Moses that he has consecrated all of the firstborn sons of Israel to himself, and he has Moses perform a census to determine their number, starting with the tribe of Levi. The number of Levite firstborn comes in at 22,000. When the rest of the firstborn in Israel are numbered, they come in 22,273. God then takes the entire tribe of Levi and sets it aside for the priesthood instead of actually taking each firstborn son from every family in Israel. Then, because there were 273 more firstborn in the rest of the tribes than there were in the tribe of Levi, God commanded that a “ransom” in silver be paid to Aaron and his sons to compensate them for the difference (Numbers 3:39-51). So, yes, it is indisputable that the tribe of Levi represented Israel to God in the performance of the priestly duties. More to the point, they represented the firstborn of Israel: those who would receive the best of the inheritance in each family and were primarily responsible for leading and teaching the next generation. It was God himself who decided this, however, and he did so long before David came on the scene. Consequently, it was not David’s division of the Levites into twenty-four courses that made them representative of Israel before God, and there is no natural reason to think of the number twenty-four as a significant “number of representation” on that basis. In fact, it would make more sense to think of the number twenty-two in that respect, given the events of Numbers chapter 3, and especially considering how the census numbers worked out between the tribe of Levi and the other tribes (which is why I took the time to relay the details of that story). Indeed, David’s division of the Levites into their respective courses was not a matter of representation; it was a simple division of labor undertaken as part of a larger reorganization effort. This becomes apparent if you go back to I Chronicles 22, where we see the beginning of the events that led to the division of the Levites. David was old and knew that he would soon die. His son, Solomon, was to succeed him, but as noted in I Chronicles 22:5, Solomon was young and inexperienced, and David was particularly concerned that the building of the temple be handled correctly. For this reason, David began to make “ample preparations before his death.” David didn’t stop with preparations for the temple, however. He went on to divide the Levites according to their various roles of service, from caring for the sanctuary, to keeping the temple treasures, to serving as musicians, officers, gatekeepers, and judges. He also reorganized the army into twelve divisions of 24,000 each and set up overseers for the king’s fields and storehouses. David then called a general meeting of the leaders of Israel and charged Solomon before them (see I Chronicles 28-29), thus making it clear to the entire nation that Solomon was his, as well as the Lord’s, chosen successor. The Heavenly Pattern When David turned the kingdom over to Solomon, he attributed the changes he was implementing to God’s own direction:
Moses, too, was given a pattern to follow for the Tabernacle and its furnishings:
The author of Hebrews tells us that the tabernacle and temple furnishings were based on objects in heaven:
Lastly, the apostle John speaks of a temple that exists in heaven:
What do these things have to do with the twenty-four elders of Revelation? The point is this: Given that the Old Covenant tabernacle and temple were built according to designs conveyed to Moses and David by God, and appear to have been based on objects that already existed in heaven, it is probable that the Levites and aspects of the Old Covenant ceremonies and offerings (although not the sin offerings) were also based on a pre-existent, heavenly pattern: namely, angelic beings and their various functions in the worship and service of God. We see a hint of priestly duties within the angelic host several times in Revelation:
Of Angels and Men The Bible tells us very little about the angelic host, but from the little we are told it is obvious that there are divisions amongst them; they are not equal to one another in duties, position, or power. In Daniel 10:12-13, the angel Gabriel tells Daniel that he was sent from God with a message for Daniel but was unable to reach him for twenty-one days due to the interference of a fallen angel, one whom he calls “the prince of Persia.” Gabriel reveals that he was only able to reach Daniel “when Michael, one of the chief princes, came to help me.” The Hebrew word translated “chief” here is ri’shown, which Strong’s defines as meaning “first in place, time or rank.” “Princes” is translated from the Hebrew word sar, which Strong’s defines as meaning “a head person (of any rank or class): —captain (that had rule), chief (captain), general, governor, keeper, lord, (-task) master, prince (-ipal), ruler, steward.” Gesenius’ Hebrew-Chaldee Lexicon states that sar refers to a “leader, commander, especially of soldiers.” The term is even used to refer to the temple priests in Isaiah 43:28 (think back again here to the priestly functions the elders appear to be carrying out in Revelation). In Jude 1:9, Michael is referred to as an “archangel.” This term is translated from the Greek word archaggelos, a compound of archo, which means “to be first…to be a chief, leader, ruler,” and aggelos, which literally means “a messenger, envoy, one who is sent,” and is usually translated “angel.” Thus Michael is one of the chief leaders, or commanders, of the angels. This is significant in that it proves that various levels of rank and organization exist within the heavenly host, just as they apparently do amongst the fallen angels, given what we read in Daniel 10 and also in Ephesians 6:12, where Paul says that believers are struggling against “principalities, powers, and rulers of darkness…in the heavenly places.” It is my contention that the twenty-four elders are archangels, the chief rulers of the angelic host. This is probably why they are depicted as sitting on thrones and wearing crowns. Dr. Gromacki, on the other hand, sees the crowns of the elders as an indication that they are saints:
How does Gromacki know that angels do not wear crowns? As previously stated, the Bible tells us very little about the angelic host. We do know for certain that they have rulers among them, however, and rulers often wear crowns. Gromacki points out that the crowns of the elders are (in the Greek) specifically stephanos crowns, crowns given for victory and achievement; but although we know relatively little about the activities of angels, it’s clear from the scriptures we’ve seen that angels engage in warfare. Is it really so unbelievable that they might be honored for their achievements in war or in other aspects of service to God? The Bible is clear that angels can be punished; why can they not also be rewarded?[2] Gromakci also has a problem with the elders being angels because they are sitting in the presence of God:
No scripture says that they haven’t done so, either. If they are rulers, and especially if they are engaged as a heavenly court (per Daniel 7), it would make sense for them to be sitting. Scripture often depicts judges as seated when hearing a matter or issuing a verdict. Gromacki continues:
A careful reading of Revelation 3:21 reveals an exegetical error in Gromacki’s argument. Jesus does promise believers that they will share his throne, but his throne is not the Father’s throne. It is crucial that this be understood. The Father rules in heaven, and Christ shares his throne now because he has not yet received his own. And what throne is it that he will receive?
Jesus is the heir to David’s throne, which he will assume in the city of Jerusalem during the Millennial Kingdom, and will rule over the entire world. Thus Christ’s throne, in which believers are promised a share, is an earthly throne. Jesus underscores this for us in Revelation 2:25-27:
Believers will not begin to reign with Christ until he receives his throne, at the beginning of the Millennium. Until then, he sits on the Father’s throne in expectation of receiving the promised kingdom.
It is true that believers “are seated in the heavens” with Christ now after a fashion, but this is only in the sense that his current exaltation at the Father’s side guarantees that the promises to us will also be fulfilled. We “sit” with him because we are considered to be “in him,” and are thus heirs along with him (see Galatians 3:29). Gromacki also sees a clue to the identity of the elders in how they are dressed:
Believers are indeed promised white garments, but the Bible also describes angels as wearing white:
White is a symbol of holiness and purity in the scriptures, and is not applied exclusively to the saints. In addition to angels who were seen clothed in white, Jesus is described as appearing in white during his transfiguration (Matthew 17:2, Mark 9:3, Luke 9:29), and Daniel describes God the Father (the Ancient of Days) as wearing a “vesture like white snow” in Daniel 7:9. What’s in a Name? On another front, Dr. Gromacki believes that the term “elder” strongly hints that saints are in view rather than angels:
I’m curious how it is that Gromacki knows that all of the angels were created at the same time and are of the same age, since the Bible never tells us this nor even implies it. Jesus told us that angels do not marry, and so we know that they must not reproduce as humans do, but this does not mean that they were all created at the same time. It is entirely possible that the angels were created in ranks, with the chief angels being created prior to rest. There is a possible parallel here in the creation of mankind. The Bible describes man as the “head” of the woman because he was created first (I Timothy 2:12-13). Genesis 2 tells us that God created Adam, put him in the Garden of Eden, gave him instructions on the care of the Garden, and brought the animals to him to see what he would call them, all before the creation of Eve. At least one likely reason for this is so that Adam would have time to learn enough to become a leader, teacher, and provider for Eve. How long this went on, we don’t know, but it seems clear from scripture that a fair amount of time must have passed. A similar scenario may have taken place with the angels. It is possible that the elders were created first and taught what they needed to know so that they could more effectively assume leadership once the rest of the angelic host were created. Thus, the archangels may indeed be older than the rest of the angels. We cannot know this for certain, but, again, we know very little about angels to start with, and next to nothing about their history. Lost in Translation? Translation issues have also arisen in the debate surrounding the identity of the elders. In Revelation 5:8-10, the elders sing “a new song” in praise to Christ, and the perspective of the song changes depending on what text you’re reading from. Bible translations based on the Textus Receptus (such as the King James, New King James, and Young’s Literal Translation) read as if the elders are singing the song in the first person, referencing themselves. Here is the passage as it appears in the King James Version:
Versions based on the Alexandrian and Majority Greek Texts, however, such as the New International Version and New American Standard Bible, render this passage in the third person. Here it is as it appears in the NASB:
Gromacki comments on this as follows:
Gromacki’s point is valid enough as far as it goes; but aside from the issue of pronoun usage, the text provides us with a strong indicator that the elders cannot be singing about themselves. Note that bothtranslations I quoted above tell us that the four living creatures as well as the twenty-four elders fell down before the Lamb and sang the new song. While we might reasonably debate the identity of the elders, I think we can all safely agree that the four living creatures are not human and thus could not possibly be singing about their salvation. The fact that the creatures as well as the elders sing the same song is a powerful indicator that the elders are not human beings and the third-person rendering is likely what the apostle John originally wrote. The Elders contrasted with the Angels Gromacki follows his observation on the translation issue by arguing that the next song sung in heaven in Revelation chapter 5 indicates that there is a distinction between the elders and the angels:
The first observation I would offer here is that the angels are not only contrasted with the elders, they are also contrasted with the four beasts, yet both the angels and the beasts are heavenly beings; so this does not necessarily prove anything with regard to the elders. Secondly, if the elders are indeed angelic chiefs or archangels, and particularly if they are seated as judges in a kind of celestial court when John encounters them, it would make sense for a distinction to be drawn between them and the more numerous rank-and-file “messengers” over whom they preside. We often see such distinctions drawn in human institutions, where high-ranking persons are referenced by rank or title in order to differentiate them from those of lower standing. For instance, most people will not refer to an admiral or a general by the generic term “soldier,” whereas they have no problem doing so with regard to lower-ranking military personnel. The Elders are High-Ranking Angelic Beings The pretribulationist case for the twenty-four elders representing the raptured church is based primarily on unsubstantiated assumptions and faulty exegesis. As I hope I’ve demonstrated here, a much stronger exegetical case can be made that the elders are, in fact, high-ranking angelic beings who lead the heavenly host and sit as a type of court in matters of divine judgment.
* Unless otherwise noted, all scripture references are from the NASB. [1] See especially Revelation 13, 17, and 19 for parallels with the visions of Daniel 7 and 9-12. [2] Isaiah 24:21 states that God will “punish the host of heaven on high.” Satan is said to have been “cast as profane from the Mountain of God,” in Ezekiel 28:16. 2 Peter 2:4 and Jude 1:6 tell us that various angels are held in confinement, awaiting the day of judgment. Jesus tells us that Gehenna (the Lake of Fire) was prepared “for the devil and his angels” (Matthew 25:41). Robert Hawes is the author of "In Search of God: A Look at Life's Most Essential Question," as well as many articles on various subjects ranging from politics to theology and Christian apologetics. His blog is: http://takeupyourcross73.blogspot.com. Article Source: http://www.faithwriters.com |
Thank you for sharing this information with the author, it is greatly appreciated so that they are able to follow their work.